[FX.php List] GD vs. Imagemagick
kfutter at sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au
Mon Sep 26 17:23:06 MDT 2005
On 27/9/05 12:00 AM, "Thes Quid" <thesquid at friedbaloney.com> wrote:
> I'd recommend using Imagemagick instead of GD, it's MUCH better.
> I've successfully used it with an FX site I'm developing.
> What is you webserver on? I run FreeBSD (unix), but there's also Imagemagick
> for windows IIS
> try here:
Thanks, I¹ll look into it. I¹ve heard of ImageMagick, but haven¹t
investigated it as I¹d assumed GD would be sufficient. We¹re using OS X
Server as our webserver, running the built-in Apache and upgraded PHP (IIS?
You¹re kidding, right?).
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FX.php_List