[FX.php List] Curious: include-page naming conventions
KFutter at sbc.vic.edu.au
Wed Oct 5 16:46:25 MDT 2011
The 'page.inc.php' variation seems to be a bit of a de facto standard, and
I've seen it used *everywhere*. So, the extra dot mustn't be an issue, but
I simply don't trust it. My own approach is to replace it with an
underscore to produce 'page_inc.php'.
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
On 6/10/11 9:40 AM, "Joel Shapiro" <jsfmp at earthlink.net> wrote:
>I've been working a bit in a number of other people's php projects
>lately, and have come across a couple naming conventions for include
>pages that I'd never noticed before:
>page.inc.php & _page.php
>Do people here use these (or other) conventions? Will an extra dot in
>a file name *never* cause problems?
>Other thoughts on the topic?
>FX.php_List mailing list
>FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. You must not disclose or use the information in this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete the e-mail and all copies. The College does not guarantee that this e-mail is virus or error free. The attached files are provided and may only be used on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the attached files, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not. The content and opinions in this e-mail are not necessarily those of the College.
More information about the FX.php_List