[FX.php List] [Off-ish] Advice on FMS8A -> FMS9A migration strategy

[Leo R. Lundgren]

Hi,

Howcome you recommend this? Is it a pure performance perspective?  
What has been working better since you switched to using two machines/ 
what were the problems when running on one machine?

Thanks,

// Leo


6 nov 2007 kl. 02.30 skrev Bob Patin:

> I haven't heard that announcement either, but I'd certainly  
> recommend it.
>
> After trying all sorts of things, we put a separate web server with  
> each of our FMS machines, and that's been working great.
>
> Anyone on this list running an FX.php web app with FMS or FMSA 9?
>
> Bob Patin
> Longterm Solutions
> bob at longtermsolutions.com
> 615-333-6858
> http://www.longtermsolutions.com
> Member of FileMaker Business Alliance and FileMaker TechNet
>
>   CONTACT US VIA INSTANT MESSAGING:
>      AIM or iChat: longterm1954
>      Yahoo: longterm_solutions
>      MSN: tech at longtermsolutions.com
>      ICQ: 159333060
>
> --------------------------
> Contact us for FileMaker hosting for all versions of FileMaker
> PHP • CDML • Full email services • Free DNS hosting • Colocation •  
> Consulting
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Joel Shapiro wrote:
>
>> On Nov 5, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Troy Meyers wrote:
>>
>>> since I've heard that it's now important that the web server be  
>>> on a different machine than the database server...
>>
>> Hi Troy
>>
>> Is this something you've heard specific to version 9?  Where did  
>> you see it?  I haven't heard this.
>>
>> -Joel
>> _______________________________________________
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list