[FX.php List] IWP vs CWP

[Michael Layne]

Frank,

I am inline with most everyone else:

I haven't touched IWP in years and cannot see doing so in the future.   
If you need something on the web in 10 minutes (ok, 1 hour maybe), you  
can use IWP to meet that quick and dirty requirement, but if you want  
to build a real web-based solution with FileMaker as the back-end, CWP  
is he answer.

Best of luck,

Michael

On Dec 1, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Joel Shapiro wrote:

> Hi Frank
>
> I agree w/ the others.
>
> My sense is that IWP is best suited for a small/limited set of know  
> users -- for whom you may have some say over their browser/OS as  
> well as an understanding/acceptance from the users that the 'site'  
> has limitations -- kind of like a FileMaker "thin client" that will  
> give a set of known users access to the datbase without them having  
> to have a license for FMP -- and possibly better performance for  
> over a WAN.
>
> I don't think IWP is suitable for a public site.
>
> -Joel
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Someone wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Just curious what people think about IWP?
>> Is it faster to setup than CWP?
>> Are there a lot of bugs?
>> Do you prefer CWP?
>>
>> Looking into setting up a REP web application for my client.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Frank
>> _______________________________________________
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list