[FX.php List] IWP vs CWP

Joel Shapiro jsfmp at earthlink.net
Sat Dec 1 13:36:24 MST 2007


Hi Frank

I agree w/ the others.

My sense is that IWP is best suited for a small/limited set of know  
users -- for whom you may have some say over their browser/OS as well  
as an understanding/acceptance from the users that the 'site' has  
limitations -- kind of like a FileMaker "thin client" that will give  
a set of known users access to the datbase without them having to  
have a license for FMP -- and possibly better performance for over a  
WAN.

I don't think IWP is suitable for a public site.

-Joel


On Dec 1, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Someone wrote:

> Hi,
> Just curious what people think about IWP?
> Is it faster to setup than CWP?
> Are there a lot of bugs?
> Do you prefer CWP?
>
> Looking into setting up a REP web application for my client.
>
> Thanks
>
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list



More information about the FX.php_List mailing list