[FX.php List] Re-That sinking feeling: FileMaker 12 & FX ?

Jon Montgomery jon at montgomerysonline.com
Thu May 10 14:18:11 MDT 2012


Troy,

I have less expertise than anyone else in this thread.  But to help my self esteem, let me take a shot...

vrev = Version Revision (just thinking out loud) and that would be something like 12.1.2 or something like that. Or a different Build number.  I have not made the jump to 12 to know the numbers at all.

"won't be too far into the future"  = Summer 2012, June or July (And this is just a pure guess)

I want to upgrade in the next year and I only have ONE site right now, so I have been following this thread VERY closely as I want to move BACK to FX.PHP from the API written via FMStudio.  I want to write my own code when I make the jump.

Thanks for letting me chime in and don't be hard on me if I am way off base.

Jon Montgomery


On May 10, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Troy Meyers wrote:

> Bev,
> 
> Thanks for sticking up for me.
> 
> I have a couple of questions about what Dave Simerly said....
> 
>> .............................................I've been told that we
>> already have a fix for this in the pipeline. It's to be included in an
>> upcoming vrev. And in answer to the question that just popped into the
>> heads of those reading this; sorry, I can't discuss release dates. But I
>> think it's safe to say that it won't be too far into the future....
> 
> I don't have experience enough to interpret this well (not that I'm a real newbie, heck I bought my first copy of FMS from YOU 10 years ago)... first, what is a "vrev", and second, what does "won't be too far into the future" suggest to you?
> 
> Thanks for any insight.
> 
> -Troy
> 
> 
> 
>> Well, what about pure XML (CWP) queries? I mean, we don't need to assume
>> that they are just for use with FX.php or php at all. :)
>> 
>> This thread addressed an issue that needed to be fixed. And it appears
>> that FMI has responded!
>> 
>> Perhaps more testing was done with the API? I know the testing I did
>> does not use portals, ergo, no bugs with FX.php. Or maybe I didn't test
>> enough when it was released.
>> 
>> Upgrading should not have had such a terrible bug! How can the export
>> XML be different than the CWP XML using the same grammar?
>> 
>> ah well, enough rants. I'm glad it will be fixed.  Beverly
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.iviking.org/pipermail/fx.php_list/attachments/20120510/65d853bc/attachment.html


More information about the FX.php_List mailing list