[FX.php List] Re: FX.php_List Digest, Vol 90, Issue 20
LELAND LONG
lelandlong at me.com
Fri Jan 13 12:48:40 MST 2012
I'll toss in my vote for github - not due to my own preference but due to me agreeing with other voter's reasonings.
Sent from my iPhone
Leland Long
IT DEVELOPER
LifePoint, Inc.
Organ & Tissue Donation Services for South Carolina
3950 Faber Place Drive,
Suite 400,
Charleston, SC 29405
Office 800.462.0755 ::
Fax 843.763.6393 ::
http://lifepoint-sc.org/
Give the Gift of Life
Register to Be an Organ & Tissue Donor at http://every11minutes.org/
On Jan 13, 2012, at 14:00, fx.php_list-request at mail.iviking.org wrote:
> Send FX.php_List mailing list submissions to
> fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fx.php_list-request at mail.iviking.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fx.php_list-owner at mail.iviking.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of FX.php_List digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Where should the source of FX.php live? (Chris Hansen)
> 2. Re: Where should the source of FX.php live? (Leo R. Lundgren)
> 3. Re: AddSortParam line shows 0 records (Bob Patin)
> 4. Re: Where should the source of FX.php live? (Steven Thoms)
> 5. Re: Where should the source of FX.php live? (Thomas Myers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:23:49 -0700
> From: Chris Hansen <chris at iViking.org>
> Subject: [FX.php List] Where should the source of FX.php live?
> To: "FX.php Discussion List" <fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org>
> Message-ID: <CD1D632A-6CC8-4EA8-9891-CC3DAC82FCFC at iViking.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hello all!
>
> For a while now, there have been a couple improvements to FX.php that haven't been widely used, because they're sitting on the SourceForge site, and I don't link there from iViking.org. Now this is bad, and I need to address this problem, and stop being a lazy slob... Also, I want FX.php to have more of the life of an open source project -- we've come a long ways since the number of PHP developers in the FileMaker community could be counted on one's fingers. That said, before I do point to the right place, I was wondering if you folks have a preference:
>
> 1) SourceForge has been around for a long time, and there's currently an FX.php distro sitting up there, and there are a couple others besides myself who have permission to make changes (Masayuki Nii and Gjermund Thorsen). That said, it wouldn't surprise me if both of those fellows have an account at the other option I'm considering...
>
> 2) github is nice and simple. I like the way that the projects are set up, and I like git for version control. I think it would be easy to point folks there, and for them to find things.
>
> So, all that said, here are my questions for the community:
>
> 1) Do you prefer one site over the other?
>
> 2) Are there those here who would like to have a more direct hand in the growth of FX.php? (Whethere coding, documentation, examples, or whatever...)
>
> 3) Do you have any opinions about the direction and/or features of FX.php in the near future?
>
> Thanks all!
>
> --Chris Hansen
> FileMaker 7/8/9 Certified Developer
> Creator of FX.php
> "The best way from FileMaker to the Web."
> www.iViking.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:28:07 +0100
> From: "Leo R. Lundgren" <leo at finalresort.org>
> Subject: Re: [FX.php List] Where should the source of FX.php live?
> To: "FX.php Discussion List" <fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org>
> Message-ID: <58CC4A79-7CB7-4B27-B2CF-86FB11834944 at finalresort.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I am not involved in using FX.php currently, I've only used it way back. But I think one thing is preferrable when you are considering this; The ability for developers to use a DVCS. I don't know what SF provides on that part, but Github is indeed an obvious option.
>
> If you like Git already, and others don't mind, why not go with that. I haven't used hg or bzr or their main social coding sites to have any relevant opinion about it.
>
> I think Google Code has support for Git nowadays as well.
>
>
> 13 jan 2012 kl. 18.23 skrev Chris Hansen:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> For a while now, there have been a couple improvements to FX.php that haven't been widely used, because they're sitting on the SourceForge site, and I don't link there from iViking.org. Now this is bad, and I need to address this problem, and stop being a lazy slob... Also, I want FX.php to have more of the life of an open source project -- we've come a long ways since the number of PHP developers in the FileMaker community could be counted on one's fingers. That said, before I do point to the right place, I was wondering if you folks have a preference:
>>
>> 1) SourceForge has been around for a long time, and there's currently an FX.php distro sitting up there, and there are a couple others besides myself who have permission to make changes (Masayuki Nii and Gjermund Thorsen). That said, it wouldn't surprise me if both of those fellows have an account at the other option I'm considering...
>>
>> 2) github is nice and simple. I like the way that the projects are set up, and I like git for version control. I think it would be easy to point folks there, and for them to find things.
>>
>> So, all that said, here are my questions for the community:
>>
>> 1) Do you prefer one site over the other?
>>
>> 2) Are there those here who would like to have a more direct hand in the growth of FX.php? (Whethere coding, documentation, examples, or whatever...)
>>
>> 3) Do you have any opinions about the direction and/or features of FX.php in the near future?
>>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> --Chris Hansen
>> FileMaker 7/8/9 Certified Developer
>> Creator of FX.php
>> "The best way from FileMaker to the Web."
>> www.iViking.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
>
>
> -|
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:42:23 -0600
> From: Bob Patin <bob at patin.com>
> Subject: Re: [FX.php List] AddSortParam line shows 0 records
> To: "FX.php Discussion List" <fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org>
> Message-ID: <823C0AE4-6433-4995-B4B4-0C7F2509D55F at patin.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Chris Hansen wrote:
>
>> 1) Sort order is an optional parameter -- the presence or absence thereof should make no difference.
>
> DIdn't realize that...
>>
>> 2) Bob, he's using username and password in the right order for that call; SetDBPassword(), a carryover from the no username days of FM6 and earlier, uses the order you specify.
>
> I'm 0 for 2 on this one; didn't notice the command he was using� I never switched from the older FX.php, so I still use the old command.
>
>
> Bob Patin
> Longterm Solutions LLC
> bob at longtermsolutions.com
> 615-333-6858
> http://www.longtermsolutions.com
> FileMaker 9, 10 & 11 Certified Developer
> Member of FileMaker Business Alliance and FileMaker TechNet
> --
> Twitter: bobpatin
> Google+: http://www.longtermsolutions.com/plus
> AIM: longterm1954
> iChat: bobpatin
> --
> Expert FileMaker Consulting
> FileMaker Hosting for all versions of FileMaker
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mail.iviking.org/pipermail/fx.php_list/attachments/20120113/9854dfe6/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:29:24 -0500
> From: Steven Thoms <sthoms at wavecomm.com>
> Subject: Re: [FX.php List] Where should the source of FX.php live?
> To: "FX.php Discussion List" <fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org>
> Message-ID: <0212CC45-1339-44E9-B8C7-1120374622AD at wavecomm.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Chris,
>
> I have no preference for site.
> I would be willing to contribute my function set I use to wrap my
> calls with.
> I am very curious about how FX will work with v12; I expect wide
> adoption of 12 early, so I think that effects business. If they are
> not changing FMPXMLRESULT.xml, I doubt there are issues, but I am
> curious. I would offer to test, but alas, no advance copy.
>
>
> Steve
> 207 798-0171
>
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Chris Hansen wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> For a while now, there have been a couple improvements to FX.php
>> that haven't been widely used, because they're sitting on the
>> SourceForge site, and I don't link there from iViking.org. Now this
>> is bad, and I need to address this problem, and stop being a lazy
>> slob... Also, I want FX.php to have more of the life of an open
>> source project -- we've come a long ways since the number of PHP
>> developers in the FileMaker community could be counted on one's
>> fingers. That said, before I do point to the right place, I was
>> wondering if you folks have a preference:
>>
>> 1) SourceForge has been around for a long time, and there's
>> currently an FX.php distro sitting up there, and there are a couple
>> others besides myself who have permission to make changes (Masayuki
>> Nii and Gjermund Thorsen). That said, it wouldn't surprise me if
>> both of those fellows have an account at the other option I'm
>> considering...
>>
>> 2) github is nice and simple. I like the way that the projects are
>> set up, and I like git for version control. I think it would be
>> easy to point folks there, and for them to find things.
>>
>> So, all that said, here are my questions for the community:
>>
>> 1) Do you prefer one site over the other?
>>
>> 2) Are there those here who would like to have a more direct hand in
>> the growth of FX.php? (Whethere coding, documentation, examples, or
>> whatever...)
>>
>> 3) Do you have any opinions about the direction and/or features of
>> FX.php in the near future?
>>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> --Chris Hansen
>> FileMaker 7/8/9 Certified Developer
>> Creator of FX.php
>> "The best way from FileMaker to the Web."
>> www.iViking.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:21:25 -0500
> From: Thomas Myers <tomlists at itainc.com>
> Subject: Re: [FX.php List] Where should the source of FX.php live?
> To: "FX.php Discussion List" <fx.php_list at mail.iviking.org>
> Message-ID: <D1826C1C-2A95-410B-959A-FB46747E1C67 at itainc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I think more and more people are going to github, so while I don't have a problem with sourceforge, I think github is more current.
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Chris Hansen wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> For a while now, there have been a couple improvements to FX.php that haven't been widely used, because they're sitting on the SourceForge site, and I don't link there from iViking.org. Now this is bad, and I need to address this problem, and stop being a lazy slob... Also, I want FX.php to have more of the life of an open source project -- we've come a long ways since the number of PHP developers in the FileMaker community could be counted on one's fingers. That said, before I do point to the right place, I was wondering if you folks have a preference:
>>
>> 1) SourceForge has been around for a long time, and there's currently an FX.php distro sitting up there, and there are a couple others besides myself who have permission to make changes (Masayuki Nii and Gjermund Thorsen). That said, it wouldn't surprise me if both of those fellows have an account at the other option I'm considering...
>>
>> 2) github is nice and simple. I like the way that the projects are set up, and I like git for version control. I think it would be easy to point folks there, and for them to find things.
>>
>> So, all that said, here are my questions for the community:
>>
>> 1) Do you prefer one site over the other?
>>
>> 2) Are there those here who would like to have a more direct hand in the growth of FX.php? (Whethere coding, documentation, examples, or whatever...)
>>
>> 3) Do you have any opinions about the direction and/or features of FX.php in the near future?
>>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> --Chris Hansen
>> FileMaker 7/8/9 Certified Developer
>> Creator of FX.php
>> "The best way from FileMaker to the Web."
>> www.iViking.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
> End of FX.php_List Digest, Vol 90, Issue 20
> *******************************************
More information about the FX.php_List
mailing list