[FX.php List] The skinny on includes
andersm at mac.com
Wed Jun 22 15:56:00 MDT 2011
I also use require_once, for the sake of functionality far more so than
On 6/22/11 4:54 PM, Steve Winter wrote:
> I always use require_once, since I only ever want to include anything
> once, and as anything I'm 'including' will contain essential
> functions, I need the entire thing to fail if it doesn't happen...
> Sent from the iPhone of Steve Winter
> Matatiro Solutions
> steve at matatirosolutions.co.uk <mailto:steve at matatirosolutions.co.uk>
> +44 777 852 4776
> On 22 Jun 2011, at 22:51, Bob Patin <bob at patin.com
> <mailto:bob at patin.com>> wrote:
>> So what about include vs. include_once? What do you use when you do
>> FX apps?
>> Longterm Solutions
>> bob at longtermsolutions.com <mailto:bob at longtermsolutions.com>
>> iChat: bobpatin
>> FileMaker 9, 10 & 11 Certified Developer
>> Member of FileMaker Business Alliance and FileMaker TechNet
>> Expert FileMaker Consulting
>> FileMaker Hosting for all versions of FileMaker
>> PHP • Full email services • Free DNS hosting • Colocation • Consulting*
>> On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Anders Monsen wrote:
>>> There are other things to consider aside from speed.
>>> include will continue after a fatal error, but require will die
>>> after a fatal error.
>>> Anders Monsen
>> FX.php_List mailing list
>> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org <mailto:FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org>
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FX.php_List