[FX.php List] Do non-field objects on layout affect performance?

[Gjermund Gusland Thorsen]

I guess the suggested practice should be, as little as possible, but
as much as necessary for the purpose of each layout.

And if you go to the level where you make one layout for each query or
FX.php-purpose you should be optimized.

ggt

2008/5/7 Derrick Fogle <derrick at fogles.net>:
> Being the one that fueled the fire of this thread, I'm glad I "lost my bet"
> about non-field objects affecting FX.php performance. I will at least keep
> field labels on all my FX layouts in the future.
>
>
>
>  On May 6, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Tim 'Webko' Booth wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On 06/05/2008, at 6:19 PM, Gjermund Gusland Thorsen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > That is true, the actual time of query, but did you find a way to
> > > measure RAM spent on server machine?
> > > Is that the same too?
> > >
> >
> > I did say 'anecdotal test' - I didn't go into the test too deeply, it was
> a quick one to just anecdotally see if there was an obvious difference.
> >
> > That database has also been replaced with a new one now, so I can't
> re-test in any case.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Webko
> > _______________________________________________
> > FX.php_List mailing list
> > FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> > http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
> >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  FX.php_List mailing list
>  FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>  http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>