[FX.php List] FMP PHP or FX.php...??

[Gjermund Gusland Thorsen]

That is the same difference in speed as for IWP vs FileMaker XML and
Lasso vs FileMaker XML

FX.php practically has no overhead to the extent possible, by physical
laws and current infrastructure.

For a single query that does not matter, but when it comes to 200'000+
queries pr day

ggt

2008/2/5, Leo R. Lundgren <leo at finalresort.org>:
> Uhm, yes? That's what i meant.
>
> 5 feb 2008 kl. 11.51 skrev Gjermund Gusland Thorsen:
>
> >> Apparently, and I don't doubt it, FX.php is a bit faster for
> >> obvious reasons,
> >
> > As proven here:
> >
> >>>>>     * F.A.P.: 14.6196269989
> >>>>>     * FX.php: 1.72123408318
> >>>>>     * F.A.P.: 14.7427921295
> >>>>>     * FX.php: 1.68022203445
> >>>>>     * F.A.P.: 15.8884699345
> >>>>>     * FX.php: 2.96020698547
> >>>>>     * F.A.P.: 14.6040740013
> >>>>>     * FX.php: 1.64016890526
> >>>>>     * F.A.P.: 15.450097084
> >>>>>     * FX.php: 1.72534799576
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Average F.A.P. Time: 15.0610120296
> >>>>> Average FX.php Time: 1.94543600082
> >
> > By a factor of 7.74 times
> > _______________________________________________
> > FX.php_List mailing list
> > FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> > http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
>
> -|
>
> _______________________________________________
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
> http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>