[FX.php List] FM Scripts vs. PHP
Bob Patin
bob at patin.com
Thu Oct 25 20:14:53 MDT 2007
I'm not sure whether it's faster or not, but I've also done separate
queries for child records.
I learned the FileMaker API a while back, and although it'll write to
related records directly, I suspect I'll still use the same method of
doing multiple queries.
I'd be interested in any testing that would show the speed difference
between a page with a single query, where a record is pulled in and
some child records, versus a page that does 2 queries--the parent and
then the child records. Does anyone hae any actual stats on this?
Might be really interesting...
Bob Patin
Longterm Solutions
bob at longtermsolutions.com
615-333-6858
http://www.longtermsolutions.com
Member of FileMaker Business Alliance and FileMaker TechNet
CONTACT US VIA INSTANT MESSAGING:
AIM or iChat: longterm1954
Yahoo: longterm_solutions
MSN: tech at longtermsolutions.com
ICQ: 159333060
--------------------------
Contact us for FileMaker hosting for all versions of FileMaker
PHP • CDML • Full email services • Free DNS hosting • Colocation •
Consulting
On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Dale Bengston wrote:
> I stopped using related fields on layouts back with v6. My
> anecdotal experience tells me it's faster to go get the data from
> the child records from a separate, optimized layout than to pull it
> through the parent record.
>
> Other databases don't have such things as portals, so it's all done
> with separate queries. MySQL is heaps faster than FMSA for
> everything we've thrown at it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.iviking.org/pipermail/fx.php_list/attachments/20071025/3914d504/attachment.html
More information about the FX.php_List
mailing list