[FX.php List] Anyone using XSLT anymore?
Bob Patin
bob at patin.com
Wed Sep 20 09:13:40 MDT 2006
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
When I do the query in FM it's really fast--far less than a second.
> Yes, you're exactly right. In fact, the 'X' in FX.php stands for
> XML. The bottleneck your client is up against is much more likely
> to be the WPE rather than PHP. PHP is wicked fast =) The MySQL
> caching class (support for which is built into FX.php) would help
> performance, but I don't know that what they're trying to do is
> really what FileMaker had in mind for the WPE... For a speed test,
> try this: perform the same query that you're attempting via FX.php
> directly in FileMaker; how long does it take?
>
> Also, what configuration is your client using on the FM side (1, 2,
> or 3 machine configuration)?
For my testing I've been using this:
FMSA on a Mac G5 2.0Ghz dual-processor
Mac OS X Server (Tiger) running on a Mac Mini 1.25, which is also
running the WPE.
Here's my question: since the WPE is on this lowly Mac Mini, would
moving it to the G5 make things faster? If so, how much faster? I
know that it's supposed to be best-practice to put the WPE on the
machine with the web server, but in this instance, is this slowing me
down?
Thanks,
Bob Patin
Longterm Solutions
bob at longtermsolutions.com
615-333-6858
http://www.longtermsolutions.com
CONTACT US VIA INSTANT MESSAGING:
AIM or iChat: longterm1954
Yahoo: longterm_solutions
MSN: tech at longtermsolutions.com
ICQ: 159333060
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.iviking.org/pipermail/fx.php_list/attachments/20060920/6f44fddf/attachment.html
More information about the FX.php_List
mailing list