[FX.php List] [OFF] IWP proposed as alternative to buying FMP
Gjermund Gusland Thorsen
ggt667 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 14:50:21 MST 2008
Well performance wise you would probably need another FMSA 8 sooner,
not to disappoint your FX.php clients.
As IWP hogs more bandwidth then plain XML traffic.
2008/12/8 Jonathan Schwartz <jschwartz at exit445.com>:
> Hi Folks,
> Help me out with this one.
> A rather "frugal" client presently accesses an FMP solution with a single
> copy of FMP 9 client. I serve the file from FMSA 8 remotely to make remote
> development easier. The client now needs to add another user. They tried to
> use two installations of the same FMP license with epected results. Rather
> than buy another copy of FMP, the client wants to follow FMI's suggestion
> that the file be served up using IWP....as an alternative to buying a second
> FMP license. (!)
> I'm not running IWP on my FMSA 8, nor do I intended to.
> However, I need to respond back to the client to tell them why it is not a
> good substitute...sort of why a screwdriver is not a good substitute for a
> hammer, although it can be done.
> Any suggestions?
> Jonathan Schwartz
> Exit 445 Group
> jonathan at exit445.com
> FX.php_List mailing list
> FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
More information about the FX.php_List