[FX.php List] Accepting user input on multiple records simultaneously

Jonathan Schwartz jonathan at exit445.com
Sun Apr 22 21:47:58 MDT 2007


In my example below, I was suggesting...what if worst case, all 100 
records were checked on a page.  Then that would produce 100 FMP 
requests in order to update all 100.  That just doesn't seem right.

What do you mean "filter the records"?

Jonathan






At 10:22 PM -0500 4/22/07, Dale Bengston wrote:
>Why not get the same found set as displayed initially and filter the 
>records to just the ones checked? Even with 100 records, I would 
>expect this to be much faster than five separate find requests to 
>FMSA for one record apiece. And this is a much better scenario than 
>editing those records to somehow flag them.
>
>Dale
>
>On Apr 22, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Jonathan Schwartz wrote:
>
>>At 8:48 PM -0500 4/22/07, Alex Gates wrote:
>>>Hi Jonathan-
>>>
>>>Maybe I don't understand exactly what you are trying to do, but 
>>>why not just do a separate find for each of the desired "checked" 
>>>records?
>>>
>>>Alex
>>
>>
>>Alex,
>>
>>I guess that that is what is needed...loop thru the checked records 
>>and issue an FMEdit() for each record checked. Seems like alot of 
>>bandwidth.  What if there are 100 records on a page?
>>
>>Jonathan
>>
>>--
>>Jonathan Schwartz
>>Exit 445 Group
>>jonathan at exit445.com
>>http://www.exit445.com
>>415-381-1852
>>FileMaker 8 Certified Developer
>>_______________________________________________
>>FX.php_List mailing list
>>FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>>http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list
>
>_______________________________________________
>FX.php_List mailing list
>FX.php_List at mail.iviking.org
>http://www.iviking.org/mailman/listinfo/fx.php_list


-- 
Jonathan Schwartz
Exit 445 Group
jonathan at exit445.com
http://www.exit445.com
415-381-1852
FileMaker 8 Certified Developer


More information about the FX.php_List mailing list